Re: Clean Water and a Healthy Planet

"I think if you look at the time stamps you'll see that in the other
thread I suggested (speculated) what you just mentioned."

Incorrect - what you speculated is absolutely NOT how the system works. We do not precipitate out the minerals in any way shape or form.

"I'm glad you pointed out that there are toxic by-products from the oxidation. But
they really aren't that much more toxic after than ther were before, so
it's kind of a wash(no pun intended)."

Incorrect - there are not toxic by-products from oxidation (part of the ECOsmarte technology). I said there are toxic by-products from chlorination - you know, what our water treatment plants do to get us safe drinking water? I'm sure you have heard of chlorination.

"the WHO Study is about micro nutrients in 3rd world countries."

Incorrect - Nowhere in that study, if you took the time to read it - does it say the study focused on 3rd world countries. In fact it's main focus was for the increased use of desalination plants and the resulting demineralized water.

"BTW, excess Copper makes the water taste nasty, and copper is not 100% benign in the gut."

Incorrect - You will never taste copper at the level added by ECOsmarte technology. Here is a study that shows the taste threshold for copper - it ranges from 2.4 to 3.8 mg/liter. ECOsmarte adds POINT 1 (0.1) to POINT 4 (0.4) mg/liter. If you drank 3-4 gallons of ECOsmarte water you would just satisfy your minimum daily requirement for copper. The action level for copper being toxic in drinking water is 4 parts per million - far, far above the level of ECOsmarte Water.

Taken directly from the WHO study "Copper - important in antioxidant function, iron utilization and cardiovascular health".

Can you please offer some facts/links/studies to defend your assertions? I offered many. Give me specifics on what is incorrect with the science summary...?

Wendy the Water Woman