Re: Clean Water and a Healthy Planet

Gotta defend my statements.

This was the 1st one I read and commented on, based on .pdf file.  The How it works while the lesser hype is still more "wishful thinking" than definitive info.

The "Science Summary" is more "Saturday Night Live "Bass-o-Matic" than "running a code" back on "St. Elsewhere", actually that was Howie Mandel, but someone  might appreciate the reference.

I think if you look at the time stamps you'll see that in the other thread I suggested (speculated) what you just mentioned.  I'm glad you pointed out that there are toxic by-products from the oxidation.    But they really aren't that much more toxic after than ther were before, so it's kind of a wash(no pun intended)

But given the errors, hype & dis-information in the science section "20-80 grams/minute of oxygen radicals..."  I don't think so "milligrams", ok "per hour" that'd be ok too.  Getting the units correct is just as important as getting the names of the ions correct.

the WHO Study is about micro nutrients in 3rd world countries.  You can't compare people that add ground straw & sand to their diets to stop the gnawing in their stomachs, to excess consuming American diets.  If we don't get enough calcium we go and buy boutique "Oyster Shell Calcium with Rose Hips".  But that's a non issue.

Perhaps the system can make potable domestic water slightly more potable, but that's still snake oil in my book.

Show me a system that can desalinate non-potable water and I'll shout with you shoulder to shoulder!

BTW, excess Copper makes the water taste nasty, and copper is not 100% benign in the gut.